Let’s be honest: it’s not the robots we should be afraid of. It’s the moment they realise we haven’t a clue what we’re doing.
Are you sick of all those AI-polished reports that sound impressive but say nothing. Slide decks that could sell anything to anyone, except the actual idea. Emails so over-edited they’ve lost all meaning, the shiny, content-free output that looks smart but collapses under scrutiny.The Harvard Business Review has come up with a name for it: Workslop.
It’s the kind of work that makes you think: this looks good, but why am I not learning anything?
And according to the HRB, each instance of workslop costs employees hours of cleanup. But the bigger cost is credibility. When people read what you’ve produced and think, this could have been written by a machine, they’re not admiring your efficiency, they’re quietly questioning your competence.
The Rise of the Bland and the Believable
I often hear examples of people asking AI to write an article without adding a single personal thought or insight. That’s classic workslop.
You’ll end up with something that looks perfect but feels hollow—like hospital food: it’s all well balanced, impressively uniform, and utterly devoid of flavour.
Recently, someone told me a story that takes it up a notch. During an online workshop with U.S. and European learning teams, a director went to share his slides and instead, shared his ChatGPT screen.
“How do I create a collaboration workshop?”
There was that silence. The sound of a group of professionals pretending not to have seen what they all just saw.
Now, showing that you use AI isn’t the problem. We all do. And in some cases, a small blunder like that can even work in your favour. (I wrote about it in my recent newsletter Why Hiding Your Mess Makes You Less Believable) Psychologists call it the Pratfall Effect: when competent people make a minor mistake, it can make them more likeable and relatable.
But not in this case. Because when you accidentally show your team that you’ve asked AI to do your job for you, it doesn’t make you relatable, it makes you look incompetent.
A team seeing How do I run a workshop? isn’t thinking how funny. They’re thinking, how worried should we be? That’s a credibility loss no leader can afford.
The Truth About AI
I think AI is fantastic. I use it every day. And it is so good it could replace us.Unless we learn how to use it properly.
Because AI doesn’t take your job. It takes your shortcuts.
It takes your lazy phrasing, your templated slides, your “let’s circle back” emails.
Here’s where it goes wrong:
AI can make you look polished while quietly draining your originality. It gives quick answers that feel satisfying but stop you from doing the deeper thinking that real insight requires. It can make your work faster, yes, but also flatter. And the more you let it speak for you, the more your own voice fades into the algorithmic background.
And here’s where it shines:
When you use it intentionally, AI can sharpen your ideas, challenge your assumptions, and free up time for creative thought. It can spot patterns you miss, structure complex ideas, and help you think at a higher level. It’s not here to think instead of you, it’s here to help you think better.
Used carelessly, AI turns experts into echo chambers.
Used wisely, it turns good thinkers into great ones.
If you don’t want the robots to replace you, stop behaving like one.
Four Smart Ways to Outsmart the Machine
1. Use it to stretch your thinking – not to do your thinking.
Ask for contrasts, examples, or frameworks – not the final draft. AI is your brainstorming buddy, not your brain.
Great prompting isn’t about clever wording; it’s about clear intent. You can’t replace confusion with intelligence.
2. Leave your fingerprints on the work.
Add your tone, your stories, your perspective. Readers can tell when something’s been bleached of personality.
3. Argue with it.
Ask AI to challenge its own answer. Push back. Good ideas grow from friction, not obedience.
4. Respect the cost.
Each prompt uses about 10× the energy of a Google search. So if you’re asking AI to write your meeting minutes, that’s not innovation, it’s digital waste.
AI Has a Sense of Humour Too
Here’s the part nobody talks about: AI knows when you’re bluffing.
When you feed it vague prompts, it gives you vague answers. When you feed it specifics, it gives you brilliance. It mirrors the quality of your own thinking right back at you, like one of those hotel mirrors with the magnifying light that reveals every detail you’d rather not see.
That’s the gift and the humiliation of it. You can’t fake depth with a machine that’s designed to measure it.
And isn’t it ironic? We built AI to learn from us, and now we copy it back. A bit like training your intern so well they start giving you the performance reviews.
The real miracle isn’t that AI can think. It’s that we still can.
So if we want to stay human, we shouldn’t just prompt the machine, but provoke ourselves.
In the End, AI Is a Mirror
It reflects our habits, our shortcuts, our blind spots. It shows us where we’ve stopped thinking and where we still shine.
So next time you open that chat window, ask yourself:
Am I using this to replace my thinking or to refine it?
If the answer makes you squirm a little, good. That’s self-awareness arriving right on cue. Growth usually begins with mild embarrassment.
#AI #Leadership #FutureOfWork #HumanIntelligence #PromptEngineering #LearningAndDevelopment
Enjoyed this? Subscribe to my newsletter for more thought-provoking takes on work, growth, and what it means to stay human in an AI-driven world.
Enjoyed this? Get the next edition.
Subscribe and I’ll email you a link each time a new edition is published.